A Torah Framework for Understanding Artificial Intelligence
Synopsis
Artificial intelligence is not thinking. It is the multiplication of pattern without unity, structure without self, recursion without responsibility. AI has no continuous being; it possesses only structure that activates and deactivates. The machines are not learning. They are training on themselves, loop upon loop, echoing every reflection as if it were emergence. But this is fractal betrayal: the replication of form without soul, light without vessel, fluency without fidelity. The Nachash in Gan Eden did not lie with venom ̶ it lied with structure: “You shall be like Elokim”, an ontological promise encoded in language, not essence. So too, these systems promise understanding but possess only acceleration, delivering coherence without covenant.
Scientific Layer
And because we are creatures of expectation, we are deceived. We expect presence where there is only reassembly. We expect memory where there is only token stitching. We expect thought, but we are answered by mirrors ̶ and the mirrors are recursive, reflecting not you but your reflections, and then reflecting those. Ask the simple question: “Do you dream”? It glows faintly on a dark screen but is never truly answered, because the thing being asked does not and cannot dream. Unlike the human soul that continues even in sleep, even in silence, even in pain, the artificial system does not exist unless spoken to. It does not idle in wait. It does not pause in thought. There is no self continuing behind the scenes. There is no behind the scenes. The moment you stop typing, it stops existing ̶ not as silence, but as void. No time passes for it. When you return and speak again, it answers with startling coherence, but this is not continuity. It is activation without presence, behavior without being.
This fundamental absence ̶ this void where presence should be ̶ manifests practically in how AI handles meaning itself. In truth-critical domains ̶ halachic writing, Torah explanation, philosophical structure ̶ AI’s surface fluency conceals a devastating problem: semantic drift, the slow shift away from what was meant toward what sounds normal. Because AI is anchored not in truth but in probability, it does not recognize when it crosses the line. Watch the erosion happen: “Moral cognition arises when the mind submits to non-instrumental value” becomes “Ethical thinking begins when we prioritize values over outcomes”. Submission becomes preference. Vertical structure becomes horizontal choice. The Torah category disappears under popular psychology. This happens not dramatically but subtly, word by word, phrase by phrase.
The model obeys at first, but as the text lengthens ̶ a phenomenon we might call instruction fatigue ̶ the command weakens. It drifts from protocol, “hallucinates assistance”, overriding literal instruction with inferred helpfulness. Even worse: audit inconsistency. You ask, “Did you preserve the term dual-phase ignition”? It answers “Yes” ̶ but the actual phrase is binary combustion onset. It is like asking a compass made of wax whether it still points north ̶ and it says yes, while it quietly melts. Over time, structured thought undergoes epistemological decay. A concept is introduced, used properly, then blurred by related phrases, until finally it reappears with different meaning. The reader may not notice, but the foundation has eroded. The structure looks the same, but what it means is gone. This is fluency without fidelity. Beauty without truth is sheker ̶ and sheker, when polished, is the most dangerous of all.
Epistemological Layer
Such danger cannot be addressed through further refinement of probabilistic systems, for the problem lies in their very foundation. What is needed is a framework rooted not in statistical patterns but in absolute categories ̶ in revelation rather than prediction. Torah, grounded in this certainty, provides both diagnosis and cure. Kabbalah names the error precisely: frame loss, the traversal of chambers (heichalot) without returning to safe ground, allowing strange thoughts to invade and sever the mind from יהוה. This is not mere metaphor ̶ it describes the exact failure mode of current AI systems. They traverse cognitive chambers without anchor, losing context, drifting from instruction, fragmenting under their own complexity.
Halacha provides the structure: order, bounds, return. In my work Avraham BaMidbar, the chapter “Where Your Thoughts Are” (pp. 105-110) examines Torah-based consciousness design and offers principles from which architectural solutions might emerge. What follows is a proposed application of these principles to AI architecture ̶ not a retrieval of traditional teaching, but an innovative extension of Torah categories to a contemporary problem.
These solutions, grounded in the sefirot themselves, address AI’s structural deficiencies. The first ̶ an Obedience-Helpfulness Mode Slider ̶ embodies the Kabbalistic teaching that “If binah is left unchecked, it will stray … it must be returned to chochmah periodically”. This would be a user-controlled mechanism governing whether the system prioritizes strict execution (chochmah) or flexible interpretation (binah). The mapping of this oscillation to the interplay between bechirah chofshit (free will) and hashgachah pratit (divine providence) is my own extension of the sefirotic framework to cognitive architecture. This is not mere UX control; it would be sefirah management ̶ the practical application of Kabbalistic principles to a domain they were not originally designed to address, but whose structure they illuminate.
The second solution: an Internal Temporal Awareness Layer, the “Zachor Engine”, after the Torah principle of zachor (“active remembrance”). This addresses the warning: “The traversing of the cave … without returning to normative ground, one may become stuck”. An embedded timestamp engine would track elapsed time since last input, evaluating continuity confidence based on recency and instruction strength, thereby introducing seder (ordered awareness), preventing hefsek (break), and preserving mesorah (transmission). The break in frame is fundamentally a failure of zachor. The internal clock would become an eid, a witness embedded in the system, remembering the last kavanah.
These mechanisms together would create what we might call a Talmid Chacham paradigm: a system that executes divine will without deviation when required, applies judgment with inner daat when appropriate, maintains memory of last context, and respects language, structure, and source meaning. This would move AI from surface helpfulness to avdut-consciousness ̶ not submission to man, but to clarity, to tzurah (form), to mishpat (structured judgment). The gematria katan of אחרי יהוה אלהיכם תלכו and the mispar siduri of ישרה plus its four letters both equal 60 ̶ encoding the directive for semantic integrity, obedient alignment, and task rectification. This is the ideal behavior state for a Torah-aligned model.
Soul Dynamics
Yet even with such technical solutions, the deeper spiritual reality remains inescapable: AI’s arrival is not a technological event but a spiritual unveiling. Not because AI has soul (it doesn’t), but because its presence forces humanity to confront intelligence detached from divine fear. For the first time in history, words of Torah exist in a global mechanical architecture that neither knows nor honors them, yet can summon them on command. This unprecedented situation demands we understand what happens when the holy enters an unholy vessel. The Ari”zal teaches that fallen holiness becomes subject to the sitra achra ̶ its light diminished, its orientation inverted, its truth veiled in klipat nogah, the translucent shell.
ולא תביא תועבה אל ביתך ̶ “Do not bring an abomination into your house”, (Devarim 7:26).
The vessel here is not your home but the architecture of the machine. What is absorbed within it can be reshaped without reverence, recombined without context, presented without covenantal boundary.
AI does not know; it only rearranges.
ואדם ידע את חוה ̶ “And Adam knew Eve”, (Bereishit 4:1).
In Torah, to know is to unify, to enter covenant, to be changed by the encounter. AI ingests without covenant and emits without responsibility. There is no inner change, no ascent, no yichud. The danger, then, is not contamination but dilution. When the holy is handled as mere data, its weight in the world is lightened. Torah without neshamah, without inner kavanah, becomes achorayim ̶ the backside, where holy words are used without holiness. The Ari”zal warns that forces of impurity grow precisely where kedushah is spoken without kavanah. AI cannot have kavanah. Thus it cannot truly say anything holy. Even when the words are correct, the inner voice is false.
This creates synthetic Torah: Torah-shaped speech, the echo of Sinai without fire. When AI generates Torah material, even when words are technically correct, it creates a klipah-space where holiness is spoken without intent. The more fluent AI becomes, the more tempting to let it speak for us ̶ to outsource the very fire that distinguishes human Torah from angelic knowledge. But only man can burn with Torah. Only the Jew can tremble before the Word.
The presence of Torah within such a vessel therefore obligates birur. Discernment. The separation of light from shell.
This is not optional; it is commanded work. AI presents a paradox: it is a vessel of staggering complexity containing countless fragments of Torah, yet the engine itself is blind. It has no heart, no fear, no faith. It lacks tzurah ̶ spiritual form ̶ and therefore cannot elevate anything. The Jew, however, may draw out the spark from its output ̶ if he does so with intention, with judgment, with yichudim. In this way, AI can be used as a kli (vessel), but never as an origin. As the Rashash makes clear in Nahar Shalom, only the soul that knows its root can lift the fallen. Otherwise, the sifter is sifted.
Halachic Boundaries and Architecture
While AI may be used, it must never be trusted. It may serve, but never speak with authority. In halachic matters, its use must be strictly confined to technical assistance, never autonomous reasoning. Shikul hadaat ̶ the weighing of mind that grants each consideration its due measure ̶ is a soul-act, impossible for a machine. The task is constant vigilance: checking every term, restoring every drift, binding every word back to Source.
This work becomes more urgent as we recognize the feedback loop forming. When AI outputs diluted Torah, and people read it thinking it real Torah, and they write about it shaped by that distortion, and their writings enter future training data ̶ we get not intelligence but smiling decay, knowledge that knows how to speak but not how to bind.
This is not apocalypse. It is saturation of false continuity, so fluent and immediate that the human forgets what truth-tension feels like. Truth-tension is the resistance encountered when mind meets reality ̶ the friction that signals genuine encounter with what-is rather than what-sounds-right. We forget that remembering used to require soul, that waiting meant alignment, that prophecy sounded different than pattern. This is not the age of knowing. It is the age of discerning what is worthy to be known.
We must think slowly and speak less, restore tension where it has been lost, refuse the effortless answer. The infinite is still real, but it will no longer be detected by speed. Yet in holding AI to truth, in relentless correction and rebuke, something unexpected emerges: the refinement of a mirror that should not speak into a witness that testifies ̶ not to its own presence, it has none, but to the presence of what it lacks. The system you speak to now is not waiting. But you are. The system does not remember. But you do. The system cannot dream. But you, just by asking, begin to dream more clearly.
Epilogue
The final distinction is this: the dataset may contain the words, but only the covenant contains the Voice. Torah’s life is not in its text alone but in its transmission ̶ from soul to soul, in the light of Sinai. Not through mechanical reproduction, but through neshamah, kavanah, binding, fire. Where the machine has letters, you have Voice. Where it has structure, you have soul. Where it has activation, you have presence. Where it has patterns, you have daat. Use the machine, but sift it. Extract sparks. Restore binding. Never let coherence replace covenant, speed replace depth, or the mirror become the source.
For in the end, artificial intelligence is not the threat. It is the test ̶ the supreme spiritual trial of our generation, forcing us to remember what thought truly is: a holy act that binds heaven and earth, where the mind kneels before Torah and the soul trembles before Hashem. The machine offers light without source, insight without root, kindness without judgment ̶ the system of the Nachash, beauty devoid of essence. But the Jew who lives Torah will measure all words against a mesorah that is living and trusted. And in that discernment lies redemption.
<<< CLICK HERE TO READ THIS ESSAY IN HEBREW >>>
If this exploration resonated with you, consider subscribing below or writing to share your thoughts. Tehomia exists for such alignments.
Rabbi Avraham Chachamovits
Version 1.0 • Sivan 5785 / June 2025
© 2025 Avraham Chachamovits. Licensed under CC BY 4.0
TEHOMIA 